Video CritiqueSubmit a written analysis based on the Watergate scandal which

Video CritiqueSubmit a written analysis based on the Watergate scandal which

Video Critique  Submit a written analysis based on the Watergate scandal, which was discussed in the video segment, and its potential violations based on 5 C.F.R. § 2635.101 (2017). Your paper should identify the individuals and/or parties that uphold the best example of public ethics and the worst examples of public ethics during the lifecycle of the news piece. Examine why public institutions need a code of ethics. Critically state the important moments of the video that you believe have an application to ethics in public administration and why citizens need to develop trust and transparency in public institutions. Draw parallels, and defend your responses. It is encouraged to research similar supporting material in order to attain a more in-depth understanding of the Watergate event. In addition to the textbook and video, you must use at least one other article from the CSU Online Library.  Ensure your paper is at least two pages in length but is no longer than four pages in length, is double-spaced, and uses 12-point Times New Roman font with one-inch margins. Section headings are also encouraged to help organize your paper.  Your paper must be written using APA format. Be sure to include a title page and a reference page, but please note that these will not count toward meeting the minimum page requirement. You must include at least one reference.  Paraphrasing is acceptable, but try to keep paraphrasing to a minimum. A good rule of thumb is to use 80% of your own work and to paraphrase 20% or less of the work of others.ScreenShot2022-04-03at1.18.05PM.pngTranscript.pdf

Using the Scenario below, Choose a collaborative tool and create an outline for a persuasive

Using the Scenario below, Choose a collaborative tool and create an outline for a persuasive

Using the Scenario below, Choose a collaborative tool and create an outline for a persuasive speech that would be 4 minutes long.  Scenario: Your organization recently shifted to remote work. Since that time, you have heard complaints from a few co-workers concerning the lack of collaboration tools and difficulty effectively collaborating in a remote environment. You also know that your supervisor has recently received a number of complaints concerning the company’s online collaboration tools. Because of these complaints, your supervisor is in search of technology that can be used to effectively facilitate remote collaboration. Your co-worker recently left you a voicemail message expressing extreme frustration with the lack of collaboration tools and has asked if there is something that can be done to help the organization select and implement a collaboration tool.  As a team leader and as part of the task force researching collaboration tools, you have been asked to present on one collaborative tool – providing context on the tool and the advantages of adopting the tool. Your goal is to convince the leadership team to adopt one collaborative tool for use throughout the organization. Step 1: Select a collaborative tool that you have used or learned about SpeechOutlineTemplate.docx

To demonstrate the above you need to analyze a major decision in a large project

To demonstrate the above you need to analyze a major decision in a large project

To demonstrate the above, you need to analyze a major decision in a large project deemed as a full or partial failure from multiple relevant decision making perspectives. Note that normally a major decision is comprised of some smaller (or a set of) related decisions, identifying and considering such decisions will add to the depth and breadth of your analysis and will provide a more comprehensive picture. For the purposes of this coursework, a ˜large project’ means project duration should be more than two years, the budget should be over two million pounds and it should have multiple external stakeholders at national and preferably at international levels (i.e., multiple countries or multiple companies from different countries).  Please read the attached coursework brief of the assignment. The assignment should be done and referred through the modules power point attached.  MANG6312-21-22-MainCourseworkBrief.pdfMANG6312-Week1-IntrototheModuleandDM-21-22-Classroom-Bb.pdfMANG6312-Week2-PMandDM-21-22-Bb-Full.pdfMANG6312-Week5-DMModels-02Mar22-Bb.pdfMANG6312-Week34-IndDM-1624Feb22-Bb.pdfMANG6312-21-22-DetailedCourseworkGuide.pdf

To Whom IT May Concern Please read the Case Study Strategic Planning at UPS in

To Whom IT May Concern Please read the Case Study Strategic Planning at UPS in

To Whom IT May Concern, Please, read the Case Study, Strategic Planning at UPS, in its entirety. 2. There are two more articles associated with this assignment, please them. 3. There is also class notes. 4. Clearly label and separate answers. 5. Avoid redundant answers.HSM430Assignment2.pdf

This is a two part assignment elaborating of the assignment provided Each part is two

This is a two part assignment elaborating of the assignment provided Each part is two

This is a two part assignment elaborating of the assignment provided. Each part is two pages and should included references. The Zen attachment is the scenario based that is required to be used. ZenEnchantmentsYogaStudioRenovationProjectProposal.docxPartoneandParttwo.docxReading539-542.docx

The purpose of this assignment is to begin drafting an internal business proposal that outlines

The purpose of this assignment is to begin drafting an internal business proposal that outlines

The purpose of this assignment is to begin drafting an internal business proposal that outlines how you will implement the solution to the problem you have identified in your organization. There are several parts to this assignment, and each part has been explained and briefly outlined in the ‘Business Proposal Project Summary’ resource. This document should be used as a guide to assist you with constructing key elements of the proposal. Word count guidelines are provided for each section of the business proposal. For this assignment, you will complete the Purpose Statement, Problem Statement, Data and Research Findings, Proposed Solution, Stakeholder Analysis and Benefits, and Implementation Methods sections of the business proposal. Purpose Statement (100-250 words) provides clear statement of why the business proposal is being made. Problem Statement including specific data (statistics and numbers) related to how the problem impacts the business. This part of the proposal should include the graph/chart/data collected from Part 1 of the benchmark-data collection assignment. Data and Research Findings (250-500 words) should include a summary of what you learned from conducting research related to what has already been done to address the organizational problem. This part of the proposal should include the graph/chart/data collected in Part 2 of the benchmark-data collection assignment. Proposed Solution (250-500 words) should include a summary of the top three problem solutions you considered to address the problem. In addition to including the graph/chart/data you collected in Part 3 of the benchmark-data collection assignment, this section should provide a succinct discussion of the pros and cons of implementing each of the top three solutions being considered to address the problem. Stakeholder Analysis and Benefits (500 words, revised if needed). Implementation Methods (250-500 words) summarize specific strategies that will used to implement the problem solution, including time and costs associated with implementation. It is important to include specific data throughout the business proposal. Include statistics that support the problem statement that can be used to establish and track goals; relate to specifics of implementation, timing, and cost; and illustrate stakeholder benefits. The proposal is an internal document that will be read by stakeholders within the organization where the problem exists, so keep this in mind and focus on this audience as you write. Within the Word document, include subsection titles to organize content according to the categories listed above to provide easy reference points for the reader. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, an abstract is not required.BUS-470-RS-Business_Proposal_Project_Summary.docxStakeholderAnalysis.docxBUS-470-RS-Stakeholder_Analysis1.xlsxBUS-470-RS-Benchmark-DataCollectionTemplate.xlsxBenchmark.docx

Submit the Work Environments Research Paper Research work environments in two organizations This paper should

Submit the Work Environments Research Paper Research work environments in two organizations This paper should

Submit the Work Environments Research Paper. Research work environments in two organizations. This paper should be no less than three full pages in length. Begin your paper discussing the importance of work environment and then report on those you have researched, why you believe those environments work for the organizations, and what skills the manager needs in order to promote such an environment. Use APA format and submit the paper through the online learning environment.

Select one technology from the years 18301920

Select one technology from the years 18301920

Select one technology from the years 18301920. Describe the technology. What problem did this technology address? What were the political effects of this technology? Describe at least one positive political outcome. Describe at least one negative political outcome. What were the social effects of this technology? Describe at least one positive social outcome. Describe at least one negative social outcome. What were the economic effects of this technology? Describe at least one positive economic outcome. Describe at least one negative economic outcome. Overall, do you believe the tradeoffs of your example were worth it for society? Why or why not? Your paper should also meet the following requirements: APA format. Title page Introduction APA citations Double-spaced sentences 12-point Times New Roman font Conclusion Reference page Three sources minimum (including the class text) Standard English grammar conventions Correct grammar Correct punctuation and spelling Logical, well-ordered sentences tech2.docx

See the links below. The Thai floods are discussed along with the resulting disruptions to the

See the links below. The Thai floods are discussed along with the resulting disruptions to the

See the links below. The Thai floods are discussed along with the resulting disruptions to the supply chain. Review this information and do a bit of research on the Internet. Then, List the risks what the companies in Thailand experienced, List the risks what companies outside Thailand experienced, and State which which insurance policy(ies) might have helped to limit the risk for Thai companies and companies outside Thailand. Links: Worst Flooding in Decades Swamps Thailand https://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2011/10/worst-flooding-in-decades-swamps-thailand/100168/ The 5 Companies Hit Hardest by the Thailand Floods http://www.riskmanagementmonitor.com/the-5-companies-hit-hardest-by-the-thailand-floods/

Scenario You are the senior clinical analyst for the Oakridge Health System. Oakridge Health System

Scenario You are the senior clinical analyst for the Oakridge Health System. Oakridge Health System

Scenario You are the senior clinical analyst for the Oakridge Health System. Oakridge Health System is comprised of Medicare-certified hospitals, home health, hospice, inpatient rehabilitation and long-term care facilities. The Chief Medical Officer (CMO) needs to identify a quality improvement initiative for the next fiscal year. You are tasked to write a white paper outlining the quality of care for Medicare-certified hospitals across the country. Instructions Your white paper should include: Analyze your state and national health care quality based on the most recent year of data reported by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Identify one quality measure from your analysis to recommend for an initiative. Provide an evaluation of the quality measure outcomes using quality improvement principles that will support your initiative recommendation. Rubric  – Clear and thorough analysis of state and national health care quality. Includes comprehensive information on data reported by CMS with multiple supporting examples.  – Identification of one quality measure from your analysis to recommend for an initiative. Includes comprehensive descriptions for the quality measure with multiple supporting examples.  – Clear and thorough evaluation of the quality measure outcomes. And Includes comprehensive justification of the quality improvement principles to support recommendation with multiple supporting examples.