“I’m just more afraid of climate change than I am of prison“

You will assess:

1) the author’s argument and intention – what are they arguing and why?

2) the author’s use of inductive or deductive reasoning – where do you see specific moments of deduction or induction? You don’t have to show both; maybe explain where they rely heavily on one or the other?

— you’ll want to explain whether the logic is weak or strong, valid or invalid, etc…. once you decide.

3) the author’s use of any three fallacies – which three stand out the most? How do they affect the validity of the argument that the author is trying to make? Does he or she know they are committing a fallacy? What’s the intention/effect of bad logic? *note: you can choose any three from any of the chapters we just read*

4) what are the consequences of the activist’s message? explain how you feel having listened to drastic measures taken in the name of climate change.